Friday 15 August 2014

Reflective Synopsis

Synopsis

Technology has the capacity to transform learning, just how it continues to transform and evolve the society we live in. The adoption of ICTs in a classroom ultimately comes down to the learning manager, the curriculum objectives and the learning theory that is used to reach learning outcomes. Just as the use of traditional teaching methods have supported and facilitated learning, the adoption of these tools in an ICT form can open student’s minds to a learning platform rich in technology. Fu (2013) highlights that studies have shown that using ICT’s not only becomes a powerful tool for educational reform, but helps students apply learning to real life situations. The University of Queensland (2014) believes that active learning can occur in conjunction with ICT’s, provide more challenging learning opportunities and facilitate active, critical thinking. Different learning managers adopt different pedagogies through the influence of internal or external factors. Productive pedagogy is achievable with ICT tools as its boundaries for learning; communicating, problem solving and engagement are endless. The infinite amount of ICT resources available to students cater for all styles, levels, but most importantly facilitate meaningful learning.

ICT can be used to substitute, augment, modify and redefine (SAMR) learning. Different types of ICT tools and resources can be implemented to develop and encourage cognitive processing.  Learning managers use different models of scaffolding thinking processes including  SAMR, Blooms Taxonomy, 5 E’s and De Bono’s Thinking Hats. These thinking processes help students scaffold their cognitive learning and develop complex and higher order thinking. In today’s society, due to the technological savvy generation currently trending, it can be suggested that most students have been engaged in ICT tools or resources (such as computers, iPads, smart phones etc). Therefore the use of these in the educational setting can be reformed to drive students to delve further into a subject than ever before. Henceforth, fostering a complex and higher level of thinking. Lincoln (2008), cites Vygotsky’s (1987) theory that by using a socially interactive tool with an exceedingly capable peer, greater cognitive engagement is promoted, therefore creating higher cognitive developments. By having guidance and social interaction with peers when using ICT tools, complex reasoning is being developed,  as students extend and refine their knowledge (Marzano, 1997).

The theory of constructivism can be applied to learning through ICT as students are actively engaged, building their knowledge and then able to reflect on the processes. Problem solving, discovery and inquiry based learning are all possible through the array of different ICT tools and resources available. However , a study conducted through schools in New South Wales found that learning managers were not confident in using ICT tools to enhance student learning (Orlando, 2011). Could this be due to a lack of knowledge on the tools and the uses in transforming learning? Orlando (2011), concluded that using a constructivist approach in conjunction with ICTS would require non-cognitive outcomes and a different emphasis on the curriculum. This raises doubt over this theory of learning, which could only be confirmed over time.  Through the reflection on theories examined, ICT can be incorporated and designed into learning experiences that drives students to the next level, both mentally and socially.

As students become more socially active and engaged in the materials discovered using ICT tools, ethical practice, safety and legal rights must all be clear. Student safety on the internet or any other socially active ICT tools will and should always be the number one priority for any learning manager. The Department of Education, Training and Employment (2012), state that schools are able to manage risks by the strong supervision of students, using a ‘school-based’ publishing site and ensure inappropriate sites are not available to students.  Teaching students about the laws of copyright and publishing is also a key principle to ICT learning. The implications of using a blog or publishing site incorrectly can be serious if students are unaware. These lessons can be used and explored further in the education or home environment. Although these risks are present, using the protection provided by the school systems, students will be able to safely use online tools.

The globalization and multiculturalism in a modern day society only increases over time. With the aid of an ICT tool students have access to a world of information that can apply to their learning and real life situations. ICT tools help to provide students with an authentic education which connects academically, socially and in actuality. This technology is flexible in time, place, availability and multiplicity, which means learning resources are constantly available for students.  Creating a supportive, collaborative learning environment is achievable when using these online resources. When students are motivated, engaged and provided with an opportunity to extend their thinking, ICT can transform their learning experiences and enhance the quality of learning.  

Through the experimentation of different ICT tools and determining their effects in the classroom I will, as a learning manager be able to facilitate an active learning environment. By utilizing the superfluity of ICT tools and interactive resources available to students, I can help students achieve their learning outcomes and goals. Leading the forefront and creating a confident student with the power to use modern authentic technology to learn is something any student deserves.


References 

Department of Education, Training and Employment. (2012). Risk management. Retrieved from http://education.qld.gov.au/web/schools/riskman.html

Fu, J. (2013). Ict in education: a critical literature review and its implications. International journal of education and development using information and communication technology (IJEDICT), 9(1), 112-125.

Lincoln, M. (2008). Higher order thinking through ICT. AARE 2008 International education conference. Retrieved from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/29054/1/29054.pdf

Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D., & Arredondo, D.E. (1997). Dimensions of learning: teachers manual. Alexandria, Virg.: Aurora, Colo.

Orlando, J. (2011). ICT, constructivist teaching and 21st century learning. Retrieved from http://www.curriculum.edu.au/leader/ict,_constructivist_teaching_and_21st_century_lear,33278.html?issueID=12401


The University of Queensland. (2014). Active learning. Retrieved from http://www.uq.edu.au/tediteach/flipped-classroom/active-learning.html


No comments:

Post a Comment